1958 Jeep CJ vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (200 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura TL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1958 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1958 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 1997 Acura TL | |
| Make | Jeep | Acura |
| Model | CJ | TL |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1997 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2840 mm |
