1958 Jeep CJ vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 182 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Suzuki C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | CJ | C2 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 848 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2240 mm |
