1958 Jeep CJ vs. 1999 Lada Samara II
To start off, 1999 Lada Samara II is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lada Samara II (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lada Samara II should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 60 kg more than 1999 Lada Samara II.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Lada Samara II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lada Samara II. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 1999 Lada Samara II | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | CJ | Samara II |
Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2470 mm |