1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 298 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Jeep | Honda |
Model | CJ | CR-V |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |