1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jeep | Jeep |
| Model | CJ | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2380 mm |
