1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2003 Lincoln LS

To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lincoln LS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lincoln LS weights approximately 530 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lincoln LS (388 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ.

Compare all specifications: