1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | CJ | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |
