1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 326 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |
