1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2005 Rover 45
To start off, 2005 Rover 45 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Jeep CJ (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Rover 45. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 45 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Rover 45. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 45. (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2005 Rover 45 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | CJ | 45 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |