1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 115 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (250 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |