1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2009 Nissan Qashqai
To start off, 2009 Nissan Qashqai is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Qashqai (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Qashqai should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Qashqai weights approximately 340 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Qashqai.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2009 Nissan Qashqai | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ | Qashqai |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2640 mm |