1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ | Megane |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |