1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | CJ | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
