1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1958 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1958 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | CJ | Epica |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |