1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (326 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | CJ | UTE |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 326 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |