1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 Audi Q3
To start off, 2012 Audi Q3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi Q3 (168 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi Q3 (280 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Audi Q3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ. 2012 Audi Q3 has automatic transmission and 1958 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1958 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi Q3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2012 Audi Q3 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | CJ | Q3 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1600 mm |