1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (139 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 498 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (176 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
Model | CJ | Orlando |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1528 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |