1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lexus RX (291 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lexus RX (317 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2013 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Jeep CJ | 2013 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Jeep | Lexus |
| Model | CJ | RX |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 291 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 317 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1885 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2740 mm |
