1958 Land Rover 109 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 2,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Land Rover 109 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1958 Land Rover 109. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1958 Land Rover 109. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Land Rover 109 weights approximately 725 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1958 Land Rover 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Land Rover 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Land Rover 109 (157 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1958 Land Rover 109 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Land Rover 109 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Land Rover | MCC |
| Model | 109 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2285 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2070 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2510 mm |
