1958 Land Rover 109 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 2,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Land Rover 109 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1958 Land Rover 109. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1958 Land Rover 109.
Because 1958 Land Rover 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Land Rover 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Land Rover 109 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Land Rover | Ford |
| Model | 109 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2285 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2070 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2490 mm |
