1958 Land Rover 109 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1958 Land Rover 109. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1958 Land Rover 109.
Because 1958 Land Rover 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Land Rover 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Land Rover 109. (157 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Land Rover 109.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Land Rover 109 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Land Rover | Holden |
| Model | 109 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2285 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
