1958 Land Rover 109 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 2,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Land Rover 109 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1958 Land Rover 109. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Land Rover 109. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Land Rover 109 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 1958 Land Rover 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Land Rover 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Land Rover 109. (157 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Land Rover 109.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Land Rover 109 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | 109 | 3 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2285 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2070 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2639 mm |