1958 Lotus 16 vs. 1950 Rover P4
To start off, 1958 Lotus 16 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1950 Rover P4. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 1950 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rover P4 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 1950 Rover P4 | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | 16 | P4 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2103 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2830 mm |
