1958 Lotus 16 vs. 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1958 Lotus 16 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus 16 | 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Lotus | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 16 | Phantom |
Year Released | 1958 | 1956 |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3690 mm |