1958 Lotus 16 vs. 1966 Simca 1300
To start off, 1966 Simca 1300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1966 Simca 1300. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 1966 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Simca 1300 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 1966 Simca 1300 | |
| Make | Lotus | Simca |
| Model | 16 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2530 mm |
