1958 Lotus 16 vs. 1980 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 1980 Reliant Scimitar is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1980 Reliant Scimitar. (133 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 1980 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Reliant Scimitar weights approximately 750 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Reliant Scimitar has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Reliant Scimitar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus 16 | 1980 Reliant Scimitar | |
Make | Lotus | Reliant |
Model | 16 | Scimitar |
Year Released | 1958 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2640 mm |