1958 Lotus 16 vs. 1990 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1990 Maserati Shamal is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Maserati Shamal (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Maserati Shamal weights approximately 770 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 1990 Maserati Shamal | |
| Make | Lotus | Maserati |
| Model | 16 | Shamal |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3217 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2520 mm |
