1958 Lotus 16 vs. 1990 Opel Omega
To start off, 1990 Opel Omega is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus 16 | 1990 Opel Omega | |
Make | Lotus | Opel |
Model | 16 | Omega |
Year Released | 1958 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2740 mm |