1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2001 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2001 Dodge Neon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2001 Dodge Neon. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2001 Dodge Neon.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Dodge Neon has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Dodge Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 2001 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Lotus | Dodge |
| Model | 16 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |
