1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2003 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2003 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Saab 03-Sep (250 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 2003 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Lotus | Saab |
| Model | 16 | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2610 mm |
