1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2003 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,873 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2003 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2003 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1301 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 2003 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Lotus 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 2003 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Lotus | SsangYong |
| Model | 16 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2873 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1851 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2830 mm |
