1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E (268 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1450 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus 16 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 16 | E |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2890 mm |