1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 269 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus 16 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 16 | CLS |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 507 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |