1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL (510 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 675 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus 16 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 16 | SL |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 510 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2570 mm |