1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2010 Audi Q7
To start off, 2010 Audi Q7 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi Q7 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi Q7 weights approximately 1910 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Audi Q7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Lotus 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi Q7 has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi Q7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 2010 Audi Q7 | |
| Make | Lotus | Audi |
| Model | 16 | Q7 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 2460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5088 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3002 mm |
