1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2010 Renault Fluence. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Fluence. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 675 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus 16 | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | 16 | Fluence |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4618 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2702 mm |