1958 Lotus Elite vs. 2007 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2007 Suzuki Reno is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Suzuki Reno (127 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1958 Lotus Elite. (71 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 485 kg more than 1958 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Suzuki Reno (179 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Lotus Elite. (105 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2007 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Lotus Elite. 2007 Suzuki Reno has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus Elite has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus Elite will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Suzuki Reno will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus Elite | 2007 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Lotus | Suzuki |
Model | Elite | Reno |
Year Released | 1958 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |