1958 Maserati 250 vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Maserati 250 (268 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2009 Volvo XC90. (232 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo XC90.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Maserati 250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1958 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1958 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Maserati 250 | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | 250 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2650 mm |
