1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 64 kg more than 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Mercedes-Benz 300D | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jeep |
| Model | 300D | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1994 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4684 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1798 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 85 L |
