1958 Mercedes-Benz SC vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1965 Triumph 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC would be higher. At 2,194 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC (105 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC weights approximately 240 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Mercedes-Benz SC | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | SC | 2000 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2194 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |