1958 MG MGA vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 MG MGA would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 MG MGA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1958 MG MGA. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1958 MG MGA.
Because 1958 MG MGA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 MG MGA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 MG MGA. (104 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 MG MGA.
Compare all specifications:
1958 MG MGA | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | MGA | Micra |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |