1958 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 324 more horse power than 1958 Morgan 4. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1958 Morgan 4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Morgan 4. (73 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Morgan 4 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Morgan | Holden |
Model | 4 | UTE |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |