1958 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1958 Morgan 4. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1958 Morgan 4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Morgan 4. (73 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Morgan 4. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1958 Morgan 4 has manual transmission. 1958 Morgan 4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Morgan 4 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Morgan | Jaguar |
Model | 4 | XF |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2908 mm |