1958 Morris Cowley vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Morris Cowley. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Morris Cowley would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 331 kg more than 1958 Morris Cowley.
Because 1958 Morris Cowley is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Morris Cowley. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Morris Cowley. (106 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Morris Cowley.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Morris Cowley | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Morris | Volvo |
Model | Cowley | C30 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 60 L |