1958 Morris Minor vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Morris Minor would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1958 Morris Minor. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1958 Morris Minor.
Because 1958 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Morris Minor | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Morris | Ford |
| Model | Minor | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2490 mm |
