1958 Nissan 211 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Nissan 211. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Nissan 211 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1958 Nissan 211. (34 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1958 Nissan 211. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Compass weights approximately 469 kg more than 1958 Nissan 211. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Compass (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Nissan 211. (67 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Nissan 211.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Nissan 211 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Nissan | Jeep |
Model | 211 | Compass |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 67 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1394 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2634 mm |