1958 Opel Rekord vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,680 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 244 kg more than 1958 Opel Rekord.
Because 1958 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Opel Rekord | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Opel | Volkswagen |
Model | Rekord | Polo |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1680 cc | 1421 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1204 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1650 mm |