1958 Porsche 356 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1958 Porsche 356.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Porsche 356. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Porsche 356 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Porsche | Jaguar |
Model | 356 | XF |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2909 mm |