1958 Riley One-Point-Five vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 1982 Audi 4000 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 4000 (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1958 Riley One-Point-Five. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 should accelerate faster than 1958 Riley One-Point-Five.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Riley One-Point-Five. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 4000 (137 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Riley One-Point-Five. (112 Nm). This means 1982 Audi 4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Riley One-Point-Five.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Riley One-Point-Five | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Riley | Audi |
| Model | One-Point-Five | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2550 mm |
