1958 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 4,887 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 16 kg more than 1958 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 1958 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Mazda |
Model | Silver Cloud | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4887 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 108 L | 76 L |